Revised Draft 2: 20/Apr/1997
The Internet: enabling whom, when and where?
Telecommunications has made it possible
to develop global markets for goods, services, money and information. The
rise of the global information economy in turn is transforming human
life, nationally, regionally, locally, and within the family. Today,
everything is changing because of telecommunications -- the nature
of work, relationships with people, media, messages, and patterns
of political life. The talk is of information superhighways and global
information infrastructures, with the potential to improve the `human
capital' -- the health, education and skills of everyone.
-
Dr. Pekka Tarjanne, Secretary-General, International Telecommunication Union (Tarjanne 1995)
ABSTRACT:
People's ability to communicate will be
a major determining factor in the shape of future trade, economics
and development. Developments in communication technology and capacity
are creating exciting new opportunities both for trade and for participation
in civil society. The shape of these new forms of trade, and the scope
of civil participation, will be determined by who has the power to
communicate: who is taking part.
The key questions are: Who will get "wired"? When? What determines
this?
What may be the outcomes of different development policies? Is there
such a social category as "information poverty" and, if there is,
what policies will exacerbate or reduce it?
SUMMARY & INTRODUCTION:
Both development economists, and economists who try to understand
the implications of a world where information is a primary item of
trade, increasingly appeal to the concept of "human capital".
The UN Human Development Report 1996
(UN 1996: 64),
for example, quotes estimates that 80% of all economic activity in countries such
as Germany and Japan is founded on "human capital" -- skills and knowledge.
It seems obvious that communication is to "human capital" as "the
velocity of money" is to money supply: in the end, it is not how much
one knows (has) that is important; but rather how much one can make pass
through one's hands. Yet that Report does not mention communication
as a factor in economic development; nor is communication capacity
a factor in its Human Development (quality of life) Index.
In an increasingly knowledge-based economy,
information is becoming at least as important as land and physical
capital. In the future, the distinction between developed and non-developed
countries will be joined by distinctions between fast countries and
slow countries, networked nations and isolated ones.
Any attempt to assess the impacts of economic policies, and particularly
of development policies, must take into account the impact of new
communication technologies.
The key feature of the most interesting of these technologies is the
possibility they offer of low-cost, many-to-many communication through
computer networks.
It is a cliché among authors dealing with this technology to
compare the possible impact of this to the undoubtedly large impact
on the course of history of the development of printing by Gutenberg
and others. It is a cliché which is difficult to avoid while
doing justice to the subject.
Gutenberg et al made possible exact communication by the few
(writers with publishers) to the many (those who were literate). Without
this, it is absolutely clear that the modern form of academic endeavour
could not exist; it is probable, in a wider sense, that modern forms
of economic activity could not exist either.
The fundamental difference with the new communication technologies
is that they are inherently "many-to-many".
This fact lies behind the novelty of the exciting opportunities which
the new technologies offer. Some of these will be reviewed at the
end of Section 1. Many of them are yet
to be discovered. The author concludes that the major risk facing the world,
in the face of these opportunities, is an increase in relative
information poverty, as inhabitants of the industrialised North move away
from the rest of the world at an accelerating rate.
Remember that a significant proportion of the world's people have
yet to become full participants in the "Gutenberg revolution" -- because
they cannot read. They certainly experience relative
poverty as a result of this. The question of whether they suffer
increased absolute poverty is an extremely difficult
one.
It is possible to construct scenarios in which mistaken or simply
absent policies for the development of communication lead to an
increase in absolute poverty. Future historians will doubtless
never be able to agree whether this in fact happened.
For brevity and relative familiarity, this paper will refer to these
new communication technologies as "the internet"; but this is to be
understood as including the immediate descendants of the internet proper.
(see Section 1)
The possibility of high-speed global communication raises interesting
practical questions, too, about future trends in trade and economics.
There is no room for technological determinism here (see
Section 2 ). The critical questions are about
who controls the technological infrastucture and who has access to
it.
However, it is worth examining some of the possible economic
changes (see Section 3) which the
new technology may facilitate. If nothing else, this will
serve as a pointer to the scope of possible changes.
A certain amount of specifically internet-based trade and commerce
is emerging now. The situation
will almost certainly change completely between the revision and the
publication of this paper.
The term "internet years" gained some currency while this paper was
being written, as a tongue-in-cheek analogy to pet-lovers' "cat years",
reckoned at seven for each human year. An "internet year" is reckoned
to be about two or three human months. Forecasting more than one internet
year ahead is hazardous.
The shape of internet communication in Africa, for example, changed
radically (see Section 4) in the
first few months of 1996. Entrepreneurs began providing internet access
service in those cities where a business market appeared to exist.
It is apparent that the goals and priorities of these pioneer entrepreneurs
differ radically from previous internet service provision in Africa,
which was focused on Non-Governmental Organisations (see
Section 5) and on providing communication as
a good in itself. The emergence of commercial enterprise, in a field
which was previously the preserve of development organisations, raises
questions over how those organisations can promote their goals in
the new circumstances.
Substantial development funds have already been allocated to improving
telecommunications infrastructure in the South, particularly in Africa
(see Section 6).
As such work continues, however, more sophisticated measures of
its progress will be required. The measures used in the first 25 years
of the internet's expansion may lead to complacency
(see Section 7).
What will be the effects of the differing priorities of the commercial
and the NGO-based internet service providers? It appears highly likely
that the commercial providers' need for rapid return on investments
which are large in local terms will lead to a further concentration
of communication capability in the cities (see
Section 8) and in the existing business elites.
More is at stake than the formal economy. A major motivation for those
who invested their effort in quasi-voluntary projects in support of
NGOs was to encourage communication to build "civil society" (see
Section 9). As is common in development
matters, the delivery of aid to and participation by women is problematic
when goals are set with reference to external models of the formal
economy.
What, then, is to be done?
It is probably not too late to re-direct a portion of these funds
from national infrastructure to local and regional infrastructure,
and to training, education and community access provision (see
Section 10). We -- you -- probably have
about five internet years -- perhaps two human years -- to make a difference.
1: A breathless tour of the technologies
The internet is more of a concept than a thing. It is a set of rules
which allow rapid transfer of information between computers, more
than it is a physical machine that one can touch. It is also best thought
of as a new means of transport for information -- the "tracks" over
which actual information services "run". In the same way that the
building of railways made regional and national newspapers possible,
the arrival of the internet (and its successors -- see below) makes
new information services possible. It could also be pointed out that
railways were essential to the emergence of such diverse economic
phenomena as commuter suburbs and summer holidays, and that the people
laying the first wooden rails in coal-mines could scarcely have imagined
either.
The first physical manifestation of the internet was in September 1969,
(Hobbes 1994)
when four computers on the West Coast of the United Stated were connected
together as part of an Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) experiment.
Notoriously, the purpose of the ARPA project was to develop a communications
system which would keep the various parts of the US military's Command
and Control hierarchy in communication after a nuclear attack. Military
planners in the US (and the other nuclear powers) were deeply worried
about the prospect of what they called "decapitation" -- a nuclear
attack on a central command post which would leave their forces "headless".
The ARPA researchers -- perhaps the most unconventional group of people
ever to get top-level security clearances -- determined that the way
to make a communication system proof against decapitation was for
it to be totally decentralised -- for there to be no head to cut off.
So their design for ARPAnet -- the basis for the internet -- had each
computer connected by high-speed data cables to a number of neighbours.
When computer A wants to send a message to computer B, it divides
it into "packets". Each packet is sent to the neighbouring C with
a note of the "address" of B. Computer C looks up the best available
route in the general direction of B, and forwards the message. If
computer C disappears, A tries its other neighbours. In this sense,
each packet is thrown into the network and left to "swim" to its destination.
This detail is included as explanation of the oft-quoted maxim "the
internet interprets censorship as damage, and routes around it".
The internet spread rapidly through universities, starting in the
USA. At a time when only a dozen or so university and defence sites
had hard-wired internet connections, thus forming a "backbone", many
universities got their first connection through "UUCP". Ancestrally,
UUCP is the Unix-to-Unix Copy Program -- a utility to allow two
computers running the Unix operating system to exchange files over
an ordinary dial-up telephone line. This was adapted to "fake" an
internet connection. The maximum speed of data transport achievable over
a high-quality normal phone line with modern digital switches (telephone
exchange/office) is about 50 kilobits per second. A Southern rural
telephone line, under attack by pests over a long distance between the
subscriber and an antiquated switch, is more likely to achieve 2400 bits
per second.
Following the spread of relatively affordable personal computers from
the early 1980s, computer hobbyists developed FIDOnet starting in 1983.
(Hardy 1993)
The computers which form FIDOnet
store messages, usually until night-time, and then dial a neighbouring
computer to exchange "what's new" through their modems. Selected computers
dial "hosts" with full internet connections to exchange messages between
FIDOnet and the internet.
Another network, using different technology, is BITNET, a proprietary
protocol linking IBM mainframe computers. Many internet services are made
available to BITNET users, and vice versa, through "gateway" computers
which translate streams of information between the two formats.
A "real" internet connection (not FIDO or UUCP) may use almost any
technology which permits higher-speed data transport than a telephone
line. The ultimate is fibre-optic cable: in laboratory tests, over
100 gigabits per second have been transmitted over a single fibre
(notoriously, thinner than a human hair). The next is a "coaxial"
land-line -- a home television's aerial cable is an example, routinely
carrying 100 megabits per second. Telecommunication satellites in
geostationary orbit, such as those in the Intelsat and Inmarsat networks,
can offer leased 1 megabit-per-second channels, over most of the earth's
surface -- at a price.
In order to make use of the internet, an individual needs at the minimum:
- a computer (a 1990 "antique" will do
nicely for sending messages);
- a modem (to convert computer files to
and from a code of squawks which can be sent over the phone);
- a functioning phone line (of relatively
high quality by Southern standards);
- a reliable supply of electricity; and
- an "account" for their modem to dial up (that is, permission
to use facilities on a computer which itself has a link to the
rest of the internet).
Table 2 shows the availability of
telephones and PCs in the top 40 world economies. It demonstrates the wide
disparities even within this severely limited range of countries.
Until late 1995, for example, people in most of Africa who had electronic
mail used this equipment and only this equipment. Most were associated
with Non-Governmental Organisations (see Section 5).
Most used FIDO networking. In late 1995, therefore, the actual internet
connections for much of Africa, outside Egypt and South Africa, were
routed through GreenNet in London. GreenNet is a charitable organisation
depending on subscription income from Northern individuals, activists
and NGOs, with minor amounts of funding from development organisations.
It is affiliated to APC, the Association for Progressive Communications
(APC 1996).
Most of the remainder passed through the French government development
research organisation ORSTOM
(Orstom 1996)
in Montpellier. (See Table 1).
FIDO users can exchange messages -- delayed by up to 24 hours -- with
anyone on the internet. They can extract information from some
databases and parts of the World-Wide Web by sending carefully
formatted email to "servers", which interpret their requests and return
the results by email. They can participate in some international
discussion fora -- but they cannot do anything which requires a continuous,
"real-time" connection.
The attention of development agencies and telecommunications
corporations alike has naturally focused on the infrastructure
question. As Cable and Wireless chair Lord Young told shareholders
in 1992: "There are only a billion and a half people with adequate
telecommunications, another billion with poor services and more than
three billion people in the world who can today only dream of a telephone."
(Holderness 1993a)
These people have no immediate hope of using even FIDOnet.
Possible interim solutions include, in urban areas, fixed-location
cellular phones, which are often cheaper than putting a lot of copper into
the ground. However, the amount of digital information which these
systems can transport (the "bandwidth", measured in "bits per second"),
is not likely to be sufficient for more demanding applications than
electronic mail. Installing cellular base stations in rural areas with
few potential subsctibers is not a profitable activity, though in some
cases it may offer a cheaper means of installing subsidised telephones
than copper wire.
There are a number of proposals for Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites
which would provide telephone service to a hand-held receiver anywhere
on the surface of the planet. The Iridium scheme,
(Lockheed 1993)
led by Motorola,
(Motorola 1995)
proposes hand-held mobile phones with 9600-bit- per-second
data connections for $2000
(Holderness 1993b).
The similar TeleDesic scheme
(Teledesic 1995),
proposed by Bill Gates of Microsoft fame and another billionaire,
Craig McCaw, promises higher bandwidth. As with Iridium, TeleDesic's
coverage for the South is a side-effect of Newton's laws of gravity:
it is simply not possible, as a result of Newton's laws, to put satellites
into orbits which cover only the US or only the industrialised North.
To cover the plum markets using low-orbit satellites, in other words,
entails covering the entire world.
Iridium was in 1993 promising service in 1998, and TeleDesic in 1995
was promising to go into service in 2000. It is not unreasonable to
guess that the recent lack of announcements from either party is related
to difficult investment decisions: the projected cost of TeleDesic
is US$9 billion. It is rumoured that Iridium managers have declared
their target market to be the "one million people who pay first-class
air-fare from their own pockets".
All these systems, based on radio transmissions, suffer from the problem
that "bandwidth" in the radio spectrum is a limited resource. (One
can no more create new spectrum than one can insert a brand-new colour
between green and blue.) Massive use in urban areas would rapidly
exhaust it. "Bandwidth" in fibre-optic cables, however, is limited
only by the number of cables one can lay and connect; and a single
fibre can theoretically provide as much bandwidth as the entire radio
spectrum.
Africa One,
(AT&T 1996)
proposed by AT&T, is a grand-scale solution to Africa's backwardness
in telecommunications.
The proposal is to spend US$2.65 billion laying fibre-optic cables
around the shore of the continent. The total bandwidth would be 40
giga-bits per second. The financial decisions on the scheme were due
to be made in late 1996. No news on implementation was, however,
forthcoming by March 1997. If the telecommunication authorities of (initially)
the coastal African countries pre-buy enough capacity, it may still go
ahead. Connecting land-locked countries presents interesting questions
of political trust and stability.
Meanwhile, internet technology is not sufficient for the multimedia
entertainment and "infotainment" applications envisaged for relatively
wealthy consumers in the North. As some Southern countries are expanding
their entire internet connectivity from an intermittent 9600 or 14,400
bits per second to a whole 1 megabit per second... "virtual reality"
applications which require more than 1 megabit per second per
household are being dreamed up.
(Holderness 1996b)
Revised internet "protocols" to deal with greater need for security,
and a massively expanded demand for "addresses", are under development
(Castineyra 1992)
This is already being transformed into a subset
(Malis 1995)
of ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode).
(ATM Forum 1997)
It seems, however, that technical solutions exist at the level of
providing workable connectivity (rather than full-motion virtual reality)
to countries and territories, at a price. What might be the effects
of this happening?
Albert Gore, Vice President of the United States, was quoted by told the World Bank in 1995 that:
The liberating effects of these technologies
have been clear around the world. Satellite stations brought medical
advice to those tending to the suffering in Rwanda. Radio and TV broadcasts
in South Africa promoted the role of voting in a democracy. Wireless
technologies are allowing emerging nations to leap-frog the expensive
stages of wiring a communication network -- for example, in Thailand,
where the ratio of cellular telephone users to the population is twice
that of the US.
A report from the Rand Corporation -- hardly a hotbed of aid
lobbying -- noted that:
With greater than 99.9 percent certainty...
one can reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between
democracy and interconnectivity. Furthermore, the coefficient on
interconnectivity is large. A single point increase on the interconnectivity
scale corresponds to an increase of 5 points in democracy rating....
Governments that try to squelch the new
information technologies to protect their monopoly on power do so
essentially at the peril of economic growth. This is... precisely
what leading analysts have been predicting: "For nations to be economically
competitive, they must allow individual citizens access to information
networks and computer technology. In doing so, they cede significant
control over economic, cultural, and eventually political events in
their countries"
(Builder, 1993: 160).
Almost everyone who comes to use the new
communication technologies can see liberatory potentials -- often,
different potentials according to their fields of interest and activity.
If one focuses on women achieving equal participation in society and
the economy, then it is easy to see that these technologies for
communication-at-a-distance
are relatively gender-neutral. (But development like video-conferencing
may, within 15 years in the North, challenge this assumption of
gender-neutrality.)
If one focuses on universal access to education, then probably
no better technology than the internet can be imagined. Anyone, anywhere,
can already explore for themselves a huge body of knowledge, and stands
some chance of being able to consult leading experts in many fields.
(For "anywhere", of course, read "anywhere with phone lines and computers".)
If one focuses on political self-organisation, then enormous potential
is apparent for people who have mobilised in geographical communities
to build global networks of mutual support. Fishing villages on India's
West Coast could make their concerns heard in European Union debates
on fishing policy; and communities in Vietnam could offer their experience
and support directly to mine-clearance programmes in Bosnia. This
does presuppose a common language; and at present the internet handles
Serbo-Croat poorly and Vietnamese not at all.
For those of us who are deeply immersed in the technologies it is,
however, often tempting to take widespread understanding of these
(various) liberatory potentials for granted. In any case, it is easier
to write with rigour about problems than potentials.
For those involved in development projects, it is tempting to concentrate
on the relative risks of the potentials not being
widely realised:
Africa needs to seize this opportunity,
quickly. If African countries cannot take advantage of the information
revolution and surf this great wave of technological change, they
may be crushed by it. In that case, they are likely to be even more
marginalized and economically stagnant in the future than they are
today. Catching the wave will require visionary leadership in Africa.
The World Bank, other international agencies, bilaterals, and NGOs
can all help.
2: Some philosophy: how revolutionary
is all this?
This paper will not deal in detail with the question of whether more
information or more communication is, in fact, better than less. Interesting
questions can be raised
about real choice and freedom. A Northern consumer in a supermarket, as an analogy,
may be faced with so many different brands of soap powder that their
freedom (or ability) to choose even among the offerings of capitalism
is swamped. Only the product which "shouts loudest" gets through.
Similar observations apply to newspapers -- and to TV news, especially
in a multi-channel environment.
(Wangler 1996)
Heavy internet users frequently describe
themselves as suffering "information overload".
There are two observations to be made on this. Firstly: of those people
who have the capability to access vast quantities of information,
some will acquire the skills to filter and make use of it.
They will become their own journalists and their own librarians. Secondly:
in the two years since the World-Wide Web became widely known in the
North, it has been confused with the internet as a whole and thus
the internet has been popularly defined as a publishing medium. This
is incorrect: the fundamental property of the internet is that it
is a many-to-many communication medium.
This paper will deal with the possible results of some people
-- and not others -- gaining extended power to communicate.
The new communications technologies do open up a range of economic
and social possibilities. Particularly when we consider trade in information
itself, the quantitative increase in speed and ease of transport and
replication is sufficient to generate qualitative changes in the kinds
of transaction which are possible.
The tired, but necessary, analogy is with the application of movable
type to printing, by Gutenberg and others. This "merely" led to a
quantitative increase in the speed and affordability of the generation
of identical texts. One outcome of this quantitative change, however,
was the development of academic publishing and hence the whole modern
concept of science. The internet is already, within a decade of its
widespread adoption in US academia, radically changed the practise of
academic research and publication in a growing number of disciplines.
(Holderness 1992)
This will be an additional brake on economic development in places
which lack connectivity.
We can no more know the impact of the new communication technology
than Gutenberg could have foreseen his role in causing modern science
or, arguably, Protestantism and hence, even more arguably, capitalism.
We should be wary of over-stretching the Gutenberg analogy -- journalist
Jim McClellan
refers to it as an "historical fairy-tale".
(McLellan 1995)
Experience also shows that many of the social issues allegedly raised
by the new technology are in fact very old issues, usefully thrown into
sharper focus by a new context.
One comparison is fairly safe. In Northern societies the car has altered
geography, removing (for those who have access to it) spatial meaning
from the concept "proximity". (In Los Angeles, people measure distance
in quarter-hours.) The internet will do the same, but more so, for
those who have access to it.
Everyone who is on the internet is in the same place.
Access to cars has, until relatively recently in Northern Europe,
been restricted largely to men. Town-planning which was centred on
the needs of those with cars decreased the mobility of those
without.
There are, however, two difference with the internet.
From the individual point of view, to get connected is expensive:
a reasonable computer costs about one year's unemployment benefit
in the UK, or about the annual income of three schoolteachers in Calcutta.
It is not, however, as expensive as getting and running a car. There
is, double-however, as yet no widespread effective equivalent to the
bus or taxi -- though the "multi-purpose community centres" proposed
in South Africa and briefly discussed in Section 9,
and the "internet cafes" spreading in Northern metropolises, provide
respective examples.
The other difference is that highways have almost universally been
installed as public works, with an explicit goal of universal access.
The Information Highway is everywhere being installed by private enterprise,
with the goal of meeting the most profitable demands.
To consider what the effects of this might be, it may be helpful to
contemplate an extreme scenario.
3: A thought experiment
Imagine, for a moment, a future in which the only multinationals are
AT&T and UPS.
In a fully wired world, there is no reason why all economic transactions
cannot be negotiated directly between those who have the goods and
those who have the needs.
If you want mangoes, and you want them now, why not browse
the producers' offers, select an exquisite variety from a farmers'
co-operative in East Timor, place and pay for an order, and have them
delivered to your door?
AT&T conveys the "bits" of contract and funds; United Parcels Service
delivers the "atoms" of physical trade. The bits/atoms distinction
was, of course, popularised by Nicholas Negroponte
(Negroponte passim)
in his Being Digital
(Negroponte 1994)
In principle, considering trade in the abstract, all other goods and
services -- from crude oil supply and tanker-leases to cigarette papers
and horoscopes -- could be traded in a continuous global "farm-gate"
auction.
This is no more than some current management shibboleths -- downsizing,
just-in-time delivery, delayering and autonomous divisions -- taken
to a logical conclusion.
The implications are quite startling. For the past two millennia,
for example, the terms of trade between Africa and the rest of the
world have been set by the middle-men -- whether they be Phoenicians,
or the Swahili-speakers who traded with the Romans, or British imperialists.
Eliminating the trader, the wholesaler and the ship-owner holds out
the prospect of, at long last, achieving fair terms of trade.
Ultimately, if someone can sew shirts at home and make $4 each, selling
them to shops, or even directly to consumers, for maybe $15 including
shipping -- why go to a factory and sew them for $0.05 each when they
sell for $40?
The real world is more complicated.
Ranil Senanayake, a founder of internet access in Kenya, points out
concrete reasons
why he does not believe the "mango picture" will happen: "the movement
of pathogenic organisms and diseases are a very real threat in trans-boundary
movement of goods."
(Senanayake 1996)
So grain brokers Booker McConnell, United Fruit
and so on may be saved by the volume of paperwork required to meet
foodstuff export/import regulations. Unless, that is, food irradiation
becomes widely acceptable...
"Further, it seems unlikely that that the producer will be able in
many instances to capitalize to a level that processes to export standards. As
I have been involved in the production, import and export of primary
good I know what a zoo this is." It must be asked, however, whether
this is to define the problem circularly.
Consider a different future in which a chain of stores like Britain's
Marks and Spencer will place orders only electronically, and only
through an "all-bells-and-whistles" system of its choosing. The cost
of connecting to this system is $2000 down and $1500 a year -- and
it can only be done in the capital city. The smaller shirt factories,
and all those in the countryside, are driven to seek poorer markets,
or go out of business. Wages are driven down and economic power is
concentrated in the hands of the wired few.
This is more than speculation. "Air freight is now so cheap
to make the shipment of humble vegetables economic and computers
enable Hilbre and its customers to make, track and record orders
all the way from field to dining room table.... If you are buying
baby corn from Marks and Spencer tomorrow, it may have been
picked in Zimbabwe yesterday." Hilbre is a farm an hour's drive
west of Harare: owner Ian Gordon also exports to mainland Europe,
Australasia and the Far East.
(Prest and Bowen 1996)
In any case, an increasing proportion of trade in and with the developed
world is trade in pure "bits" of information. The imminent advent
of electronic cash
(Chaum 1990-)
is likely to create a parallel economy, largely divorced from the "real world".
(Holderness 1996a)
Initially the items of trade will be information, and advice. Notably,
the most visible item of trade on the internet today are news and
pornography (in that order).
This "parallel economy" may not immediately be an issue for people
who suffer a severe shortage of actual cash, let alone the virtual
kind. In 1994, however, the European Union's Directorate-General XIII
projected that nearly half the new jobs created in the EU before 2010
would be information-related
(Wilkinson 1995)
The major area of uncertainty in that projection
is whether those jobs will be created in the EU -- or in the few high-literacy,
highly-connected, relatively-low-wage areas of the South. The low-literacy,
poorly-connected areas can be projected to slide to an even lower
rung on the wage economy ladder.
(Holderness 1995)
The future world where all trade with all is not a thought-experiment
confined to these pages. People are busily trying to build it.
4: Entrepreneurs wire Africa
World-wide, there has been considerable expansion in the number of
people with access to telephones.
Over the past ten years about 200 million
new main telephone lines have been installed world-wide, bringing
the total to some 575 million. The proportion of lines in lower income
countries increased from 20 per cent to 30 per cent over the same
period. Progress in the right direction certainly. But the lower income
countries contain 85 per cent of the world's population -- there is
a long way to go.
The grossly uneven distribution between
population and access to telephone lines is frequently illustrated
in terms of teledensity -- the number of main telephone lines per 100
inhabitants. Average teledensity in high income countries is now 49,
increasing from 38 ten years ago. Over the same period the average
teledensity in the rest of the world rose from just 2.0 to 3.5, some
countries even experiencing a drop in teledensity as the installation
of main lines failed to keep up with population growth....
In most high income countries about 10
per cent of the population live in the capital city, which is served
by about 10 per cent of the telephone lines in the country. The situation
is dramatically different in many low income countries with a predominantly
rural economy. Here only 4 per cent of the population is concentrated
in the capital city, but they benefit from nearly a third of the telephone
lines. Rural areas suffer from really severe telecommunications blight.
In Ghana, for example, in Spring 1995 the country's total network
connectivity was ten 14,400 bit-per-second leased lines to Cambridge,
England, costing $7500 a month each, reports Dutch journalist Michiel
Hegener.
(Hegener 1995)
One was used by the SWIFT inter-bank clearance system, and another
by the air-traffic control network SITA -- which reaches parts of
the world which no other network touches and plans to offer internet
services wherever governments allow competition with the state telephone
company.
By early 1996, the private Network Computer Systems internet host
in Ghana's capital had 140 subscribers paying US$1300 a year each.
Martin Mulligan of the Financial Times points out
that this is the entire annual income of a Ghanaian journalist.
(Mulligan 1995)
"Our customers are expats, large companies, and a few Ghanaian researchers,"
Network Computer Systems Deputy Director William Tevie told Hegener.
(Hegener 1995)
UUnet-Pipex is active
in South Africa and half a dozen other countries in Sub-Saharan Africa,
and is looking for partner companies in more.
(Pipex1996)
Business Development Manager Ashley Oliver thinks aloud about the company's motivation:
"Opportunism would be the wrong word... 'accident', no: We followed
up on African contacts when some other companies regarded the continent
as wholly impracticable. Africa is not significant in terms of our
total business, but we'd hate there to be a part of the world where
we didn't have a presence."
(Oliver 1996)
Mr Oliver lists the requirements for commercial investment in an internet
service provider as, in this order:
- Political stability
- Availability of bandwidth -- though
the possibility of starting up with a satellite link makes this nearly
universal, at a price
- Availability of technical expertise
- Telecommunications deregulation
And what does Mr Oliver believe the effect of wiring Africa will be?
"It's a genuine stimulant for communication at all levels. The internet
is an adaptive technology and does tend to produce what communities
require, rather than meeting the goals for which it was put in in
the first place. I guess it's about 'empowerment'."
Ashley Oliver estimates that it costs about US$500,000 to set up a
full-service internet service provider (ISP). "If you're the smallest
phone company in the world, that's not a lot, but if you're a community-based
enterprise it's a great deal of hard-to-get hard currency."
To compile an exhaustive list of commercial projects in Africa would
be exhausting. It seems reasonable to predict, however, that within
the next three years, most capital cities which are not in the thick
of armed conflict are likely to have a satellite connection.
5: The internet and Non-Governmental Organisations: actors and facilitators
The first steps towards wiring Africa were taken by intrepid activists
with a mission to communicate, fanning out across the continent with
rucksacks full of modems. (The French did their bit in a rather more
elegant way.)
By January 1996, it was possible to use electronic mail at least in
the capital cities of most countries. The breakdown of technologies
was as follows (excluding South Africa):
Table 1: Email hosts in Africa, January 1996
internet & BitNet: 7*
GreenNet/gnfido 21
other FIDO 3
ORSTOM UUCP 14**
other UUCP 8
Total: 53
From an internet information posting
maintained by Randy Bush
* (Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, Zambia)
** (Dakar has IP-over-X.25 too)
Note that the version 15 of Landweber's
map (Section 8) shows an increase in
full internet access since this
table was issued.
Between mid-1993 and the end of 1995 GreenNet forwarded 2.2 million
messages between the developed and less-developed worlds, at a total cost
of US$80,000: an average of US$0.036 per message.
(Banks 1996)
It did this mostly using the lowest technology applicable to the internet,
direct-dial FIDOnet connections.
Michiel Hegener calculates that to move a 2000-word message between
the Netherlands and Ghana costs US$34 if you make a voice call from
Amsterdam and read it out; $7.00 if you send it as a closely-typed
fax; and $0.20 to $0.40 if you send it as email. If you put it in
the post, it may or may not arrive.
(Hegener 1995)
This kind of low-tech electronic mail is thus the only kind of
inter-continental communication that many Southern groups can afford.
Karen Banks of GreenNet says that, when she started six years ago,
"no-one else was working with local indigenous initiatives [in the
South], and there was no technical or moral support. One reason why
GreenNet's partners in Africa have been so successful," she says,
is "that there is a personal, co-operative working relationship --
so they felt neither isolated nor dependent."
(Banks 1996)
Though the FIDO networks thus established are slow and cumbersome
by the standards of Northern techno-enthusiasts, they meant that by
the beginning of 1996 NGOs in Africa had better connectivity than
many or most governments.
Karen Banks identifies one reason for the success of these projects
in their own terms as the establishment of an equal co-operative relationship
between users and initiators in the South and facilitators in the
North.
(Banks 1996)
There are two further reasons:
- the users and initiators in the
South are motivated by a pre-existing perceived need to communicate
regularly and rapidly with counterparts elsewhere in the world; and
- the guiding principle of the facilitators
in the North is simply that communication is A Good Thing.
This is not to say that activists such as Banks proceeded from a
theoretical assessment of the importance of communication to
development. Rather, is seems likely that many found themselves
simultaneously possessing interests in the politics of development
and in electronic communications, and created for themselves
opportunities to combine the two. Attempts in interview to get
Karen Banks to say why she had chosen this field of work produced:
"I was very interested in the politics of the continent, but am not
and will never be an academic of any kind nor a politician."
Why, the author asked, communications and not something else?
"It was something that used my mathematical bent... it had to be good
for the world in general -- it was something that I absolutely knew
I had to do, and that was it."
(Banks 1996)
6: Development programmes
The Gondwana project, based in Belgium
and Zimbabwe and dedicated to improving connectivity worldwide, has
identified at least 40 agencies and NGOs which have internet-related
projects in Africa. (See Appendix 1.)
(Gondwana 1996)
One, for example, the US-based Leland initiative, has $15 million to
spend in 20 countries. It was launched in January 1996 after US
Vice-President Al Gore had invited the USAID agency to lead a U.S.
effort to "bring the Global Information Infrastructure to Africa".
By the end of January 1997 it had signed Memorandums of Understanding
with the governments of Mali, Madagascar, Rwanda, Mozambique, Ghana,
Cote d'Ivoire, Guinea, Benin and Guinea-Bissau. In February 1997 it
commenced a programme of technical training for African instutions
and individuals.
(Leland 1997)
In March 1995 a World Bank report noted that, using Very Small Aperture
Terminal satellite dishes, "full Internet nodes could be established
in the 47 sub-Saharan African countries currently lacking this level
of service for approximately $30 million, including the first year's
operating cost and exclusive of local labor costs."
(Baranshamaje 1995: 14)
Compare the situation in India, where in late 1996 the author was able
to identify two internet service providers and a total of 23 FIDO
"bulletin boards" in the entire country
(See list, Appendix 2).
These bulletin boards' description of their content gives a strong
computer-hobbyist flavour. Subscriptions started at US$8 a month --
payable in hard, not local, currency.
The Indian state telecommunications enterprise has been criticised
for pricing independent operators out of the market by charging such
high prices for the relatively high-speed connections they would need
that they cannot compete with the prices it offers for 9600-bits-per-second
dial-up access in Bombay and Delhi. In India, a high-speed link is
64 kilobits per second; the academic ERNET has lines of this speed
from Bombay to Bangalore, Juhu and the USA. The university sites in
Madras and Pune must make do with 9600 bits per second each -- whereas
the author is struggling to meet his information needs with three
times that capacity for himself alone.
Internet connectivity in India was thus "thinner" in 1996 than
that in the African continent. However, the opening of the Indian
economy to direct inward investment is likely to produce pressure
for a very rapid change in this situation.
7: How much of the world is wired?
From the beginnings of the international expansion of the internet,
statistics have been maintained on the numbers of states and
territories in which the network is accessible. These record an
impressive growth, especially when presented in graphical form.
Larry Landweber's maps, distributed by the Internet Society,
categorise territories as having full internet access, Bitnet
but not the internet proper, electronic mail only through UUCP or
FIDOnet links (see Section 1) or no connectivity.
Landweber's latest map
(Landweber 1996)
suggests an almost-complete project.
Almost the whole world, it seems from a casual inspection of this
map, has turned internet-coloured. The sun never sets on the internet;
it appears to reach everywhere except some war-torn corners of the world.
Consider, however, that only in Europe, Australia, North America and
Japan is there a genuine national communications infrastructure.
There may be a full internet connection at the University in Ulan Bator,
but ten kilometers away there are no telephones.
As a first approximation at a realistic map, the author has faded
the colours of non-metropolitan areas outside the OECD countries. In
addition, in an attempt to correct the perceptual distortion
inherent in the map projection used, the author has "greyed out"
major tundras, icefields and deserts:
The picture is rather different; and it is not dissimilar to a map
of per-capita income.
This map, it should be noted, is an approximate freehand
adjustment for illustrative purposes. The author is cuurrently seeking
funding for a research project to develop accurate metrics of the
availability of the internet to people rather than to
territories.
8: Who is getting wired? The implications of exclusion
We should be aware that the geography of communication capacity is
much more complicated than a North-South divide. The author lives
in a largely Bangladeshi-populated area of London, ten minutes' brisk
walk from the Bank of England. That walk crosses the route of a British
Telecom tunnel carrying huge quantities of fibre-optic bandwidth for
the City financial institutions. But cable television -- which can
be used as a low-cost, high-speed internet connection -- will not
be available in this pocket of the city for several years. (It must
be understood that the author wants cable television only for the
side-effect of fast internet access, not for any frivolous reason.)
Nevertheless, the disparities in the South are enormously greater.
The disparities between urban and rural areas in the South are great
and some current development policies will increase them. The Action
Plan from the first International Telecommunications Union World
Telecommunications Development Conference, held in Buenos Aires in
March 1994, set these goals:
Special assistance to the least developed
countries is given top priority. And for the LDCs specific targets
were set for the year 2000:
Fully meeting the demand for telecommunication
services in urban areas. This means virtually eliminating the waiting
list for services by that year, which translates into an average urban
main line density of five per 100 population
Achieving a rural main line density of
one main line per 10,000 inhabitants.
The FIDO systems and other low-tech solutions cannot be expected to
meet the entire long-term communications needs of the populations
they serve. But they do have a mission to extend communication to
as wide a range of their societies as possible, and to offer support
and training.
There seems to be a risk that large-scale projects such as the Leland
initiative will, in many African countries, be left behind as commercial
enterprises move to meet business needs.
Many of the small-scale projects are concerned that the income upon
which they depend for their training and outreach work is jeopardised
by the arrival of commercial ISPs, creaming off their heaviest users.
Those users cannot be blamed for preferring a fully-interactive connection
to the delays of store-and-forward technology.
Some of Karen Banks's colleagues at GreenNet are outraged by this
development, seeing it as commerce threatening their strategy. "Mukla
in Uganda is an indigenous organisation," says Jill Small, "which
has been working in the country for the past 10 years... and now..."
In January StarCom arrived in Kampala, with the backing of US Sprint
and the Norwegian phone company Telenor. It provides 1 Mbit/second
of full internet capacity in Kampala through a "VSAT" satellite dish.
(Banks 1996)
But Mike Jensen, who was in at the beginning of WorkNet, and now manages
to combine street-level assistance to community groups with high-level
conferences, stresses that the people on the ground are more pragmatic.
(Jensen 1996)
Charles Musisi in Uganda has negotiated
with StarCom for Mukla to use its bandwidth -- part of that set aside,
under the agreement with Norway, for free use by universities.
In Dakkar as in London, commercial ISPs start by wiring the richest
sectors of the population. In other words, bandwidth is distributed
by ability to pay. Since increased bandwidth will increase ability
to pay, there is a serious risk of starting another vicious circle
of increasing economic inequality.
High-quality connectivity is also at present being made available
only in the cities. It can be argued that a major reason why people
migrate from the countryside to towns, and from small towns to cities,
is "bandwidth": the higher communication capacity of a crowded place,
of a factory compared to a rural workshop. It is not entirely fanciful
to suggest that current trends in telecommunications will exacerbate
the problems of urban migration -- when, in theory and leaving aside
the economics -- they ought to do the opposite by dissociating
communication from physical proximity.
"Information poverty" clearly exists as a relative condition.
The privileged -- overwhelmingly concentrated in the North -- are
moving rapidly away from the rest of the world's population in terms
of their (our!) unprecedented access to information and communications.
This is enough cause for concern. The same communication technology,
used in broadcast mode, ensures that almost all citizens of the planet
are informed of the conditions of life of the most privileged.
Watching street children in Calcutta watching "Dallas" and MTV on
satellite television raises a number of interesting philosophical
questions about the nature of poverty. It must raise, too, immediate
political questions. What will be the effects on the aspirations of
this generation?
It is widely accepted by ex-citizens of the ex-German Democratic Republic that the widespread availability of Western television
played a major role in motivating people to seek political change
and "openness". (All the ex-East-Germans with whom the author has discussed the
matter speak bitterly of the experience of discovering what the West was
actually like, after the changes had been achieved...)
One immediate and clearly apparent result of the massively increased
visibility of relative poverty in the past decade is massive
resentment among the younger generation. Some of this may be channelled
into backlash and fundamentalist rejection: the author suspects that
the burning down of a Kentucky Fried Chicken franchise in Bangalore
in February 1996 may turn out to be a kind of iconic event -- but
whether its historical equivalent turns out to be a church in Dresden
in 1968, or a beer-cellar in Munich in 1923, remains to be seen.
One risk which development organisations can and must address is that
inequality of access to communications may promote increases in absolute
poverty. The scenario above, in which control of (for example) textile
export markets is concentrated and wage levels in the remaining home-market
sector are depressed, is a risk to be taken seriously.
It is not clear how any of this will affect the very poorest -- who
have only heard gossip about telephones, perhaps -- but it is all
too often unclear what any kind of infrastructural development has
to do with these people.
The consequences go beyond the economic sphere. Political power in
these days rests to a significant extent on access to information
and the means to disseminate information. This, too, is being concentrated
in the hands of urban elites.
9: Connectivity and Civil Society
In the sense popularised by Czech poet-president Vaclav Havel, "civil
society" is all the clubs, associations, pressure groups and play-groups
without which there is, indeed, no such thing as society: only investors,
hired hands and consumers.
At a workshop on women and technology in Delhi, participants were
asked by an aid worker "but how does email improve the quality of
women's lives?" Their answer should be sufficient: "It allows us to
communicate!"
(Banks 1996)
The participants also recounted how email had enabled them to communicate
the actual results of an election count to colleagues in Delhi, before
"revised" results could be published.
In South Africa, networking was seeded by
people who can now admit to being associated with COSATU, the
Communist federation of trade unions, and with Church-based human
rights groups.
Their goals were precisely to help "civil society" to communicate.
WorkNet started in 1987 as a FidoNet operation. Andriette Esterhuysen,
now its director, says the motive was simple: "I was working on human
rights information, and wanted to feed information about South Africa
to other countries directly, not through the North." From the beginning,
WorkNet workers travelled the country with rucksacks of modems, connecting
community organisations in small towns and villages.
(Esterhuysen 1996)
Now rechristened SangoNet, the project is one of many full-internet
service providers in the country -- and the low-tech part is still
essential to communication with small towns and villages.
Andriette Esterhuysen reports "a lot of
discussion about community access in South Africa -- for example
through multi-purpose community centres. But there's not a lot of
clear direction or commitment from the centre." At present, the
onus for providing that sense of direction almost certainly rests
with SangoNet.
Provision of connectivity through community centres of various kinds
does seem to be the main route to providing access for civil society.
In particular, in most of the world connectivity provided to commercial
enterprises will reach only locally-rich men. Collective or communal
access points seem to be the only way to extend access to
women, children and male employees.
It might be objected that large areas of the world have no libraries
and poor schools: why worry about modems for people who have no books?
But is there a reason why aid agencies should not assist these areas
to leap directly to remote-learning capability -- in other words,
for development aid financed on the back of interest in communications
to create "virtual" libraries and schools where there are
now no "real" ones?
10: Conclusions
Communications policy must be a part of any aid and development policy.
The exact consequences of growing information inequity are hard to
predict precisely, but the chances of them being beneficial to human welfare
as a whole are vanishingly small.
In those countries in the South with reasonable political stability,
commercial enterprise is likely to provide connectivity, to the capital
city at least, in the very near future. Initially this may happen
through entrepreneurs -- with overseas backing, which may include
logistical support by aid agencies -- installing satellite dishes.
In the longer term, projects of the scale of Africa One -- the
proposed high-capacity fibre-optic communication ring around Africa,
described in Section 1 -- are likely
to mature to meet growing demand. It is also possible that projects
to provide global satellite connectivity, such as Iridium
and/or TeleDesic and/or one of their competitors will render physical
location practically irrelevant, for those who can afford the receiver
equipment.
It is the unstable countries -- those which US aid agencies are rumoured
to be avoiding -- which will need serious assistance to acquire publicly
accessible internet connectivity. As discussed in
Section 1, direct satellite links such as those promised by
Iridium and TeleDesic offer a solution only for an absolutely wealthy
minority.
In this sense, the problem for development agencies and economists
is not now one of connecting countries, but of connecting people.
To be provocative, the author proposes that country-level infrastructural
support be provided only to those countries which in the throes of
civil war.
Development organisations should form relationships with these commercial
ISPs where they exist, as with the Norwegian support for StarCom mentioned
above. They should use these relationships, and their influence with
governments, to promote telecommunications regulation regimes which
promote community access.
One possibility is to lobby countries to impose "Universal Service
Requirements", with timetables for compliance, as a condition of licenses
to new ISPs. A telephone company operating under a Universal Service
Requirement is legally bound to provide service to anyone who asks
for it, wherever they are in the relevant territory; the extra charges
which the company may make for remote connections are regulated. This,
however, runs counter to a very powerful "de-regulatory" current in
world-wide telecommunications policy. It may be practicable, however,
to require operators to provide low-cost connections to schools and
community facilities as capacity is installed in their areas.
Commercial enterprises may well resist even such mild regulatory initiatives.
There appears to be an illogical prejudice that all regulation should
be resisted. It is illogical because efforts of any kind to promote
widespread access to communication, beyond the very small elite markets
which exist now, are building a potentially huge market for such services
in the near future. Commercial enterprises should be reminded at every
opportunity that the large market for private internet connectivity
in the United States was built entirely on university students being
given access free at the point of use -- and then looking around for
ways to stay connected when they finished their courses.
The primary focus of financial aid for communications should be shifted
immediately from the country-level infrastructure programmes to the
village level -- with the exception of International Telecommunications
Union-level support for programmes such as Africa One. This reverses
the priorities set out by the Buenos Aires Conference and
listed in Section 8.
The greatest effects have over the last decade been achieved by the
programmes with the lowest budgets, such as GreenNet's. There is scope
-- and funding can in principle be redirected to -- for hundreds or
thousands of such outreach projects to work at local level throughout
the South. The major restriction on the emergence of such projects
may be the supply of individuals having enough persomal committment
to the concept to go through the organisational hoops required to
obtain funding.
Such projects stand the highest chance of avoiding the "rusting tractor"
outcome of failed development projects. Maintenance of computers and
internet connections in the South is difficult; it is likely to be
achieved only where there is a close connection between indigenous
organisations with the need, and outside facilitators with the means.
Such organisations also need to shift their focus from the country
level to the village level. They may find that their work becomes
less "glamorous": eventually it will integrate completely with health
and education aid work. Eventually, in other words, telecommunications
should disappear as a separate concern, and become an integral part
of human capacity-building work.